<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 593 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185626</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 8,28,000 under section 68 of the Income-tax Act related to share application money received by the assessee-company. The ITAT found that the share holders were genuine and had confirmed their investments, emphasizing that even if the subscribers were not genuine, the share capital could not be treated as undisclosed income. Therefore, the ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the addition under section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 593 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185626</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 8,28,000 under section 68 of the Income-tax Act related to share application money received by the assessee-company. The ITAT found that the share holders were genuine and had confirmed their investments, emphasizing that even if the subscribers were not genuine, the share capital could not be treated as undisclosed income. Therefore, the ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the addition under section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>