<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 713 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185619</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Rs. 10,37,500 as undisclosed income. The ITAT emphasized the importance of supporting explanations with evidence and precedent, highlighting the need for assessing officers to establish a clear link between transactions and undisclosed income before making such additions. The decision underscored the significance of fair treatment of taxpayers based on credible evidence and legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 713 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185619</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Rs. 10,37,500 as undisclosed income. The ITAT emphasized the importance of supporting explanations with evidence and precedent, highlighting the need for assessing officers to establish a clear link between transactions and undisclosed income before making such additions. The decision underscored the significance of fair treatment of taxpayers based on credible evidence and legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>