<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1458 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185615</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, remitting the issues of bad debts and Keyman Insurance Policy back to the Assessing Officer for further verification and decision. The disallowance of the Research &amp;amp; Development fee was upheld based on insufficient evidence and discrepancies in accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:11:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1458 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185615</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, remitting the issues of bad debts and Keyman Insurance Policy back to the Assessing Officer for further verification and decision. The disallowance of the Research &amp;amp; Development fee was upheld based on insufficient evidence and discrepancies in accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>