https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331366 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal against the Order-in-Appeal rejecting their cenvat credit demand. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing, availed credit on duty paid on inputs from a 100% Export Oriented unit. The Assistant Commissioner's demand confirmation led to appeals up to the Tribunal. The appellant argued their entitlement to credit of education cess and special additional duty, supported by precedents. Relying on consistent legal interpretation and precedents, the Tribunal, through Shri S. S. Garg, Judicial Member, set aside the impugned order, granting relief to the appellant and emphasizing legal clarity in cenvat credit disputes. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331366 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal against the Order-in-Appeal rejecting their cenvat credit demand. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing, availed credit on duty paid on inputs from a 100% Export Oriented unit. The Assistant Commissioner's demand confirmation led to appeals up to the Tribunal. The appellant argued their entitlement to credit of education cess and special additional duty, supported by precedents. Relying on consistent legal interpretation and precedents, the Tribunal, through Shri S. S. Garg, Judicial Member, set aside the impugned order, granting relief to the appellant and emphasizing legal clarity in cenvat credit disputes. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331366