<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 749 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331365</link>
    <description>The demand and penalty could not be sustained because the department failed to comply with the earlier remand direction to supply copies of all relied upon documents before adjudication. That non-supply deprived the assessee of a fair opportunity to defend the case and amounted to a violation of natural justice. The tribunal therefore did not examine the limitation or merits objections and allowed the appeal on the ground of procedural unfairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 749 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331365</link>
      <description>The demand and penalty could not be sustained because the department failed to comply with the earlier remand direction to supply copies of all relied upon documents before adjudication. That non-supply deprived the assessee of a fair opportunity to defend the case and amounted to a violation of natural justice. The tribunal therefore did not examine the limitation or merits objections and allowed the appeal on the ground of procedural unfairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>