<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 999 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185608</link>
    <description>The appeals were found to be fully covered by an earlier Bombay High Court ruling on the same international taxation issue, and the Court declined interference on that basis. Applying the prior decision as controlling authority, it held that the questions raised lacked merit and dismissed the appeals. Costs were awarded to the respondent on dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 999 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185608</link>
      <description>The appeals were found to be fully covered by an earlier Bombay High Court ruling on the same international taxation issue, and the Court declined interference on that basis. Applying the prior decision as controlling authority, it held that the questions raised lacked merit and dismissed the appeals. Costs were awarded to the respondent on dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>