<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1191 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185607</link>
    <description>The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the special civil application in order to pursue an alternative remedy, and the Court granted that request. The petition was accordingly disposed of as withdrawn, the notice was discharged, and no costs were ordered. The text reflects a procedural termination of the proceeding rather than a determination on the merits of the central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:43:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1191 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185607</link>
      <description>The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the special civil application in order to pursue an alternative remedy, and the Court granted that request. The petition was accordingly disposed of as withdrawn, the notice was discharged, and no costs were ordered. The text reflects a procedural termination of the proceeding rather than a determination on the merits of the central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>