<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1089 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185606</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal by restricting the disallowance of expenses to 10% of unverified expenses and deleting the addition of unexplained share application money under section 68 of the IT Act. The decision was based on errors in the calculation of disallowance and the burden of proof regarding the creditworthiness of shareholders, aligning with legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1089 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185606</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal by restricting the disallowance of expenses to 10% of unverified expenses and deleting the addition of unexplained share application money under section 68 of the IT Act. The decision was based on errors in the calculation of disallowance and the burden of proof regarding the creditworthiness of shareholders, aligning with legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>