<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 983 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185593</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that disallowance of Rs. 37,76,204 for utilizing interest bearing funds for interest free loans was made on incorrect grounds as no link was found. The Tribunal also upheld the decision that the interest payment made to DDA was not penal in nature and could not be disallowed unless it contravened any law. Consequently, the disallowance of the interest payment to DDA was deleted. No separate judgment was delivered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 983 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185593</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that disallowance of Rs. 37,76,204 for utilizing interest bearing funds for interest free loans was made on incorrect grounds as no link was found. The Tribunal also upheld the decision that the interest payment made to DDA was not penal in nature and could not be disallowed unless it contravened any law. Consequently, the disallowance of the interest payment to DDA was deleted. No separate judgment was delivered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>