<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185588</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of a penalty of Rs. 60,89,535/- under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1993-94. It was held that the disallowances made by the assessee were based on a debatable interpretation of law and not indicative of furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income. The Tribunal found that the claims were made in good faith, leading to the conclusion that the penalty was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 17:01:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185588</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of a penalty of Rs. 60,89,535/- under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1993-94. It was held that the disallowances made by the assessee were based on a debatable interpretation of law and not indicative of furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income. The Tribunal found that the claims were made in good faith, leading to the conclusion that the penalty was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>