https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185586 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the assessment order for the assessment year 2001-2002. The reassessment under section 148 for section 2(22)(e) applicability did not result in any addition, yet the Assessing Officer disallowed certain expenses. The Tribunal held that since no section 2(22)(e) addition was made, the additional expenses were unwarranted. Relying on the precedent of CIT Vs. Jet Airways (I.) Ltd., the Tribunal ordered the deletion of the expenses added without justification. The appeal was granted on April 27, 2011. en-us Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:30:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185586 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the assessment order for the assessment year 2001-2002. The reassessment under section 148 for section 2(22)(e) applicability did not result in any addition, yet the Assessing Officer disallowed certain expenses. The Tribunal held that since no section 2(22)(e) addition was made, the additional expenses were unwarranted. Relying on the precedent of CIT Vs. Jet Airways (I.) Ltd., the Tribunal ordered the deletion of the expenses added without justification. The appeal was granted on April 27, 2011. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185586