<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 209 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4535</link>
    <description>Discharge certificates issued by an export agency were treated as valid evidence of compliance where the appellants remitted the agency&#039;s loss arising from domestic sale of export quota sugar. The tribunal noted that the statutory scheme under the Sugar Export Promotion Act, 1958 allowed the agency to regulate export quota, require delivery from factories, and in appropriate cases permit domestic sale or adjust the export arrangement. Contemporaneous correspondence and the agency&#039;s own confirmation supported the certificates as official acts under the scheme. On those facts, the export quota obligation was found to have been discharged, so no failure to deliver quota sugar existed to justify additional excise duty or connected penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 209 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4535</link>
      <description>Discharge certificates issued by an export agency were treated as valid evidence of compliance where the appellants remitted the agency&#039;s loss arising from domestic sale of export quota sugar. The tribunal noted that the statutory scheme under the Sugar Export Promotion Act, 1958 allowed the agency to regulate export quota, require delivery from factories, and in appropriate cases permit domestic sale or adjust the export arrangement. Contemporaneous correspondence and the agency&#039;s own confirmation supported the certificates as official acts under the scheme. On those facts, the export quota obligation was found to have been discharged, so no failure to deliver quota sugar existed to justify additional excise duty or connected penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>