<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1019 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was not sustainable. The reassessment proceedings under section 148 were challenged due to lack of conditions precedent, and the disallowance of deduction under section 80RR was contested. The Tribunal, relying on relevant judgments, concluded that both the reassessment and disallowance were not justified, leading to the deletion of the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1019 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was not sustainable. The reassessment proceedings under section 148 were challenged due to lack of conditions precedent, and the disallowance of deduction under section 80RR was contested. The Tribunal, relying on relevant judgments, concluded that both the reassessment and disallowance were not justified, leading to the deletion of the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>