<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 880 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185577</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that there should be no addition in the firm&#039;s hands for partner capital contributions. The burden to explain the source of investment lies with the partners individually. The Assessing Officer was deemed incorrect in adding the amount to the firm&#039;s income and should have taken action against the individual partners. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 25.05.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 10:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 880 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185577</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that there should be no addition in the firm&#039;s hands for partner capital contributions. The burden to explain the source of investment lies with the partners individually. The Assessing Officer was deemed incorrect in adding the amount to the firm&#039;s income and should have taken action against the individual partners. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 25.05.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>