<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 117 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the proviso to para 3 of Notification No. 52/2003-Cus is inapplicable since the final product, Aluminum Wheels, is excisable. The order dated 29.07.2005, which did not demand Customs Duty on the imported Aluminum Ingots, was upheld. The order dated 09.02.2007 demanding duty was set aside. Consequently, Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessees&#039; appeals were allowed, negating the duty demand and penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 117 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the proviso to para 3 of Notification No. 52/2003-Cus is inapplicable since the final product, Aluminum Wheels, is excisable. The order dated 29.07.2005, which did not demand Customs Duty on the imported Aluminum Ingots, was upheld. The order dated 09.02.2007 demanding duty was set aside. Consequently, Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessees&#039; appeals were allowed, negating the duty demand and penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>