<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 788 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185576</link>
    <description>Central excise appeals before the Supreme Court were dismissed, and the extract records no reasons or substantive legal principle beyond that outcome. The document therefore confirms only the disposal of the civil appeals in favour of the respondent, without any additional adjudicatory findings on classification, duty liability, or procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 10:02:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 788 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185576</link>
      <description>Central excise appeals before the Supreme Court were dismissed, and the extract records no reasons or substantive legal principle beyond that outcome. The document therefore confirms only the disposal of the civil appeals in favour of the respondent, without any additional adjudicatory findings on classification, duty liability, or procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>