https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4533 The Tribunal found the department's appeal invalid due to lack of unanimous agreement by the Chief Commissioner's Committee, leading to rejection of the authorization and dismissal of the appeal. The denial of exemption under Notification No. 69/2003-CE was set aside due to the Committee's failure to consider pending machinery payments. Emphasizing independence, the Tribunal set aside Orders due to lack thereof. Cases were remanded to the Chief Commissioner for a fair decision, with clarification on the right to appeal post the Chief Commissioner's decision. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4533 The Tribunal found the department's appeal invalid due to lack of unanimous agreement by the Chief Commissioner's Committee, leading to rejection of the authorization and dismissal of the appeal. The denial of exemption under Notification No. 69/2003-CE was set aside due to the Committee's failure to consider pending machinery payments. Emphasizing independence, the Tribunal set aside Orders due to lack thereof. Cases were remanded to the Chief Commissioner for a fair decision, with clarification on the right to appeal post the Chief Commissioner's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4533