<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 734 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331350</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming a 25% deduction under Section 80IC for the relevant assessment years, not the 100% claimed by the assessee. The tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the assessee, emphasizing that the deduction period is limited to ten years, with the first five years at 100% and subsequent years at 25%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 734 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331350</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming a 25% deduction under Section 80IC for the relevant assessment years, not the 100% claimed by the assessee. The tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the assessee, emphasizing that the deduction period is limited to ten years, with the first five years at 100% and subsequent years at 25%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>