<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1297 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185572</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further examination and decision. The Tribunal set aside the order of the ld. CIT(A) and directed the AO to re-examine the claim of the assessee regarding disallowance made under section 14A of the Act, considering the argument that investments were for strategic business purposes and not solely for earning dividend income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 07:45:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1297 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185572</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further examination and decision. The Tribunal set aside the order of the ld. CIT(A) and directed the AO to re-examine the claim of the assessee regarding disallowance made under section 14A of the Act, considering the argument that investments were for strategic business purposes and not solely for earning dividend income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>