<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185573</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed the disallowance of short term capital loss u/s. 94(7) and disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D of the I.T. Rules. It directed the AO to reexamine the disallowances, considering specific circumstances and legal principles. The judgment highlighted the exclusion of strategic investments in computing disallowances under Rule 8D(iii) and remitted the matter back to the AO for further assessment. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 07:45:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185573</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed the disallowance of short term capital loss u/s. 94(7) and disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D of the I.T. Rules. It directed the AO to reexamine the disallowances, considering specific circumstances and legal principles. The judgment highlighted the exclusion of strategic investments in computing disallowances under Rule 8D(iii) and remitted the matter back to the AO for further assessment. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>