https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185561 The ITAT upheld the deletion of the addition of household expenses by the CIT(A) due to lack of supporting material. Regarding the addition of unexplained cash and jewellery, the CIT(A) reduced the amount after considering explanations but the ITAT found discrepancies and directed a re-decision, emphasizing the importance of thorough examination of facts. The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Aug 2016 17:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185561 The ITAT upheld the deletion of the addition of household expenses by the CIT(A) due to lack of supporting material. Regarding the addition of unexplained cash and jewellery, the CIT(A) reduced the amount after considering explanations but the ITAT found discrepancies and directed a re-decision, emphasizing the importance of thorough examination of facts. The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185561