https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4527 The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the demand of service tax and penalties, leading to appeals before the Tribunal by both the assessee/appellant and the Department. The Department's appeals were not listed during the hearing. The Tribunal deferred the hearing to quantify the outstanding demand and consider the pre-deposit/stay under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act due to the appellant's non-cooperation. The Tribunal criticized the appellant's conduct and adjourned the appeal to be listed alongside the Department's appeals. The Central Board of Excise & Customs was directed to investigate the refund granted to the appellant. en-us Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4527 The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the demand of service tax and penalties, leading to appeals before the Tribunal by both the assessee/appellant and the Department. The Department's appeals were not listed during the hearing. The Tribunal deferred the hearing to quantify the outstanding demand and consider the pre-deposit/stay under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act due to the appellant's non-cooperation. The Tribunal criticized the appellant's conduct and adjourned the appeal to be listed alongside the Department's appeals. The Central Board of Excise & Customs was directed to investigate the refund granted to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4527