https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331334 The appellate authority set aside the order imposing service tax and penalty in favor of the appellants, ruling that the demand for service tax was unsustainable as the services provided were considered export of services. Additionally, the rejection of the refund claim on the grounds of being time-barred was deemed unsustainable, and the appellants were entitled to a refund of the amount deposited as no levy was made in accordance with the service tax law. Both appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants, granting them consequential reliefs. en-us Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331334 The appellate authority set aside the order imposing service tax and penalty in favor of the appellants, ruling that the demand for service tax was unsustainable as the services provided were considered export of services. Additionally, the rejection of the refund claim on the grounds of being time-barred was deemed unsustainable, and the appellants were entitled to a refund of the amount deposited as no levy was made in accordance with the service tax law. Both appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants, granting them consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331334