<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1664 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185553</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petitions, waiving the pre-deposit condition, and set aside the impugned order. The appeals were allowed based on the precedent that Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess are not applicable to goods cleared from an EOU unit to DTA, in line with the decision of a Larger Bench, rendering the impugned order unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1664 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185553</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petitions, waiving the pre-deposit condition, and set aside the impugned order. The appeals were allowed based on the precedent that Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess are not applicable to goods cleared from an EOU unit to DTA, in line with the decision of a Larger Bench, rendering the impugned order unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>