<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 712 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331328</link>
    <description>The court allowed a second test on imported goods used for manufacturing umbrellas, directing examination by the Textiles Committee Laboratory. The petitioner was required to bear the costs for the repeat test, with a pre-deposit refundable based on the test results. The judgment set timelines for testing completion and result delivery but made no specific cost awards. No order on costs was given, and parties could request urgent certified website copies of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 712 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331328</link>
      <description>The court allowed a second test on imported goods used for manufacturing umbrellas, directing examination by the Textiles Committee Laboratory. The petitioner was required to bear the costs for the repeat test, with a pre-deposit refundable based on the test results. The judgment set timelines for testing completion and result delivery but made no specific cost awards. No order on costs was given, and parties could request urgent certified website copies of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>