<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 709 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331325</link>
    <description>The court upheld the jurisdiction of the officers to issue the show cause notice, dismissed the writ petition and appeal, and directed the company to respond to the allegations within two weeks. It emphasized compliance with Customs Notifications and Foreign Trade Policy, instructing the Commissioner of Customs to expedite proceedings. The court affirmed Central Excise Officers&#039; authority to investigate customs violations and highlighted the need for cohesive action among revenue wings to prevent revenue loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 709 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331325</link>
      <description>The court upheld the jurisdiction of the officers to issue the show cause notice, dismissed the writ petition and appeal, and directed the company to respond to the allegations within two weeks. It emphasized compliance with Customs Notifications and Foreign Trade Policy, instructing the Commissioner of Customs to expedite proceedings. The court affirmed Central Excise Officers&#039; authority to investigate customs violations and highlighted the need for cohesive action among revenue wings to prevent revenue loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>