https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331322 The remand to the Tribunal, originally confined to reconsideration of exemption under clause (d) of the notification dated 10.09.2004, was enlarged so the appellant could also urge entitlement under clause (e). The SC found no reason to deny a limited expansion of the remand scope, allowing the Tribunal to examine both clauses (d) and (e) on reconsideration. No view was expressed on the merits of either claim, and the Tribunal was left to decide the exemption issues in the first instance. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331322 The remand to the Tribunal, originally confined to reconsideration of exemption under clause (d) of the notification dated 10.09.2004, was enlarged so the appellant could also urge entitlement under clause (e). The SC found no reason to deny a limited expansion of the remand scope, allowing the Tribunal to examine both clauses (d) and (e) on reconsideration. No view was expressed on the merits of either claim, and the Tribunal was left to decide the exemption issues in the first instance. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331322