<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 704 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331320</link>
    <description>The court allowed W.P.No.30169 of 2015, quashing the impugned order dated 17.08.2015. Consequently, the demand challenged in W.P.No.30170 of 2015 dated 24.06.2015 was also quashed. The court found that the impugned order should be interfered with based on previous decisions by the Tribunal and the Supreme Court, as well as the respondent Department dropping multiple show-cause notices issued to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 704 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331320</link>
      <description>The court allowed W.P.No.30169 of 2015, quashing the impugned order dated 17.08.2015. Consequently, the demand challenged in W.P.No.30170 of 2015 dated 24.06.2015 was also quashed. The court found that the impugned order should be interfered with based on previous decisions by the Tribunal and the Supreme Court, as well as the respondent Department dropping multiple show-cause notices issued to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>