<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 115 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4523</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 77 for non-payment of service tax due to doubts about liability and non-collection from clients. However, interest on delayed payment was upheld as different case laws cited were not directly applicable. The case underscores the importance of timely tax payment, awareness of tax obligations, and the nuanced approach taken in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 115 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4523</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 77 for non-payment of service tax due to doubts about liability and non-collection from clients. However, interest on delayed payment was upheld as different case laws cited were not directly applicable. The case underscores the importance of timely tax payment, awareness of tax obligations, and the nuanced approach taken in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>