https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331315 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing cenvat credit for rent-a-cab services utilized from January 2011 to March 2011 based on relevant case law. However, for the period after April 1, 2011, the appellant was deemed ineligible for cenvat credit as per Rule 2(l) (B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant for non-compliance with the rules regarding cenvat credit. In conclusion, cenvat credit was allowed for the earlier period but denied for the subsequent period, and the penalty was upheld. en-us Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331315 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing cenvat credit for rent-a-cab services utilized from January 2011 to March 2011 based on relevant case law. However, for the period after April 1, 2011, the appellant was deemed ineligible for cenvat credit as per Rule 2(l) (B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant for non-compliance with the rules regarding cenvat credit. In conclusion, cenvat credit was allowed for the earlier period but denied for the subsequent period, and the penalty was upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331315