https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331314 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the disallowance of Cenvat credit on input services. The tribunal found the appellant had complied with job work rules, making them eligible for the credit under Notification No. 214/86-CE. Legal precedents supported the appellant's position, emphasizing the admissibility of input services used in job worked goods exempted under the notification. The tribunal clarified that the duty demand issue was not part of the current appeal, ultimately deciding in favor of the appellant. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331314 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the disallowance of Cenvat credit on input services. The tribunal found the appellant had complied with job work rules, making them eligible for the credit under Notification No. 214/86-CE. Legal precedents supported the appellant's position, emphasizing the admissibility of input services used in job worked goods exempted under the notification. The tribunal clarified that the duty demand issue was not part of the current appeal, ultimately deciding in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331314