<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 689 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331305</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Assessing Officer was dismissed, and the Cross Objection filed by the assessee was partly allowed. The First Appellate Authority&#039;s decisions on the Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) exemption under Section 54F and adoption of Fair Market Value (FMV) were upheld. The issue of Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) exemption on a transaction between blood relatives was remitted back to the First Appellate Authority for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:51:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 689 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331305</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Assessing Officer was dismissed, and the Cross Objection filed by the assessee was partly allowed. The First Appellate Authority&#039;s decisions on the Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) exemption under Section 54F and adoption of Fair Market Value (FMV) were upheld. The issue of Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) exemption on a transaction between blood relatives was remitted back to the First Appellate Authority for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>