<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 678 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331294</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court orders in the special leave petitions, finding no basis on the facts to disturb those orders and dismissing the petitions. The Court did not decide the substantive legal question raised in the matters and expressly left that question open for determination in an appropriate future case. No general legal proposition was affirmed or reversed, and the High Court&#039;s conclusions remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 678 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331294</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court orders in the special leave petitions, finding no basis on the facts to disturb those orders and dismissing the petitions. The Court did not decide the substantive legal question raised in the matters and expressly left that question open for determination in an appropriate future case. No general legal proposition was affirmed or reversed, and the High Court&#039;s conclusions remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>