<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 114 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4518</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering reasonable cause and the nature of the breach in determining the imposition of penalties under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The case highlighted the distinction between technical breaches and deliberate violations, underscoring the need for a balanced approach in penalty assessments related to statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 114 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4518</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering reasonable cause and the nature of the breach in determining the imposition of penalties under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The case highlighted the distinction between technical breaches and deliberate violations, underscoring the need for a balanced approach in penalty assessments related to statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>