<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 673 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331289</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to order the mutilation of imported goods was deemed to be beyond the scope of the show cause notice, violating the principles of natural justice. The appellant&#039;s appeal against the mutilation order was allowed, emphasizing the need to uphold natural justice principles in such cases. The issue of classification of imported goods was ultimately decided in favor of the appellant by the Adjudicating authority in the remand proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 673 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331289</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to order the mutilation of imported goods was deemed to be beyond the scope of the show cause notice, violating the principles of natural justice. The appellant&#039;s appeal against the mutilation order was allowed, emphasizing the need to uphold natural justice principles in such cases. The issue of classification of imported goods was ultimately decided in favor of the appellant by the Adjudicating authority in the remand proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>