https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331287 The High Court held that the petitioner was correct in excluding turnovers disputed in earlier writ petitions from the calculation of disputed turnover for the appeal. The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the audit memo, and directed the petitioner to re-present the appeal with the correct pre-deposit. The second respondent was instructed to proceed with the appeal in accordance with the law. en-us Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331287 The High Court held that the petitioner was correct in excluding turnovers disputed in earlier writ petitions from the calculation of disputed turnover for the appeal. The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the audit memo, and directed the petitioner to re-present the appeal with the correct pre-deposit. The second respondent was instructed to proceed with the appeal in accordance with the law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331287