<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 669 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331285</link>
    <description>Assessment orders passed without considering detailed objections, without calling for supporting records, and without granting a requested personal hearing are vulnerable as non-speaking orders. In a tax assessment, the authority must act quasi-judicially, examine the material placed before it, and give reasons reflecting application of mind. Failure to do so breaches natural justice. On these facts, the orders were held unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 669 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331285</link>
      <description>Assessment orders passed without considering detailed objections, without calling for supporting records, and without granting a requested personal hearing are vulnerable as non-speaking orders. In a tax assessment, the authority must act quasi-judicially, examine the material placed before it, and give reasons reflecting application of mind. Failure to do so breaches natural justice. On these facts, the orders were held unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>