<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 113 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4516</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, emphasizing that the assessing officer should have considered all relevant facts and claims, especially those arising from subsequent developments post the Section 263 direction. The judgment highlighted the importance of a thorough examination of claims for deduction during assessment proceedings, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 113 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4516</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, emphasizing that the assessing officer should have considered all relevant facts and claims, especially those arising from subsequent developments post the Section 263 direction. The judgment highlighted the importance of a thorough examination of claims for deduction during assessment proceedings, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>