<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 656 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the issue of bonus shares does not attract dividend distribution tax under Section 2(22)(a) and that the addition for cessation of liability under Section 41(1) was not justified. The detailed findings were supported by relevant case laws and material on record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:19:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 656 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the issue of bonus shares does not attract dividend distribution tax under Section 2(22)(a) and that the addition for cessation of liability under Section 41(1) was not justified. The detailed findings were supported by relevant case laws and material on record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>