<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 650 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331266</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and set aside the High Court&#039;s orders, directing a fresh consideration of the review petition and appeal on their merits. It clarified that review petitions are maintainable under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, even when the notional tax effect surpasses the prescribed limit, establishing a precedent for similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 650 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331266</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and set aside the High Court&#039;s orders, directing a fresh consideration of the review petition and appeal on their merits. It clarified that review petitions are maintainable under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, even when the notional tax effect surpasses the prescribed limit, establishing a precedent for similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>