https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331264 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition seeking the release of seized jewellery due to conflicting statements on ownership by family members. The petitioner's claim based on the panchanama and absence of tax arrears was challenged by the 4th respondent's involvement and tax arrears totaling Rs. 1,01,84,550 of family members. The Court directed the 1st respondent to review the petitioner's representations within six weeks but emphasized pursuing remedies under the Income Tax Act due to conflicting statements. No costs were awarded in the judgment. en-us Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:14:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331264 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition seeking the release of seized jewellery due to conflicting statements on ownership by family members. The petitioner's claim based on the panchanama and absence of tax arrears was challenged by the 4th respondent's involvement and tax arrears totaling Rs. 1,01,84,550 of family members. The Court directed the 1st respondent to review the petitioner's representations within six weeks but emphasized pursuing remedies under the Income Tax Act due to conflicting statements. No costs were awarded in the judgment. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331264