<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 642 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331258</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act was upheld, with the Tribunal emphasizing that genuine transactions must comply with the section unless falling under specific exceptions. The issues concerning additional compensation and the Rs. 16 lakhs addition were remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification. The addition of Rs. 28 lakhs was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:11:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 642 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331258</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act was upheld, with the Tribunal emphasizing that genuine transactions must comply with the section unless falling under specific exceptions. The issues concerning additional compensation and the Rs. 16 lakhs addition were remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification. The addition of Rs. 28 lakhs was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>