<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 641 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331257</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 263, affirming disallowances by the Assessing Officer and emphasizing the need for proper enquiry and substantiation of claims. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, reinforcing the importance of detailed scrutiny in tax assessments to prevent erroneous outcomes prejudicial to Revenue interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:11:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 641 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331257</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 263, affirming disallowances by the Assessing Officer and emphasizing the need for proper enquiry and substantiation of claims. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, reinforcing the importance of detailed scrutiny in tax assessments to prevent erroneous outcomes prejudicial to Revenue interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>