<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 828 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals by the Revenue and the assessee for statistical purposes, remitting the issues back to the AO and CIT(A) for reconsideration based on the Tribunal&#039;s observations and directions. The Tribunal stressed the importance of consistency and proper verification of facts, particularly concerning the availability of interest-free funds and the treatment of deferred revenue expenditure. The order was pronounced on 29th April 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 09:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 828 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals by the Revenue and the assessee for statistical purposes, remitting the issues back to the AO and CIT(A) for reconsideration based on the Tribunal&#039;s observations and directions. The Tribunal stressed the importance of consistency and proper verification of facts, particularly concerning the availability of interest-free funds and the treatment of deferred revenue expenditure. The order was pronounced on 29th April 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>