<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (5) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185534</link>
    <description>Interest income assessed under the head &quot;other sources&quot; permitted only the deductions expressly authorised by Section 12 of the Indian Income-tax Act. Expenses for maintaining an establishment for a proposed business, or for keeping a company alive before business commenced, could not be imported from Section 10 or treated as allowable under Section 12. The deductible amount was confined to non-capital expenditure actually incurred solely for earning and collecting the interest income. The Tribunal&#039;s allowance was sustained only because it could be supported as an estimate of such actual expenditure, while its broader reliance on establishment expenses was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:17:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (5) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185534</link>
      <description>Interest income assessed under the head &quot;other sources&quot; permitted only the deductions expressly authorised by Section 12 of the Indian Income-tax Act. Expenses for maintaining an establishment for a proposed business, or for keeping a company alive before business commenced, could not be imported from Section 10 or treated as allowable under Section 12. The deductible amount was confined to non-capital expenditure actually incurred solely for earning and collecting the interest income. The Tribunal&#039;s allowance was sustained only because it could be supported as an estimate of such actual expenditure, while its broader reliance on establishment expenses was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>