<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 733 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185529</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found that the removal of the appellant from the position of Check Pilot was in violation of principles of natural justice. Despite typically ordering a fresh inquiry, the appellant&#039;s superannuation made it impractical. The Court set aside the removal order, reinstated the appellant as a Check Pilot, and awarded compensation of Rs. 25,000, emphasizing the importance of upholding natural justice principles and providing appropriate relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:15:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 733 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185529</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found that the removal of the appellant from the position of Check Pilot was in violation of principles of natural justice. Despite typically ordering a fresh inquiry, the appellant&#039;s superannuation made it impractical. The Court set aside the removal order, reinstated the appellant as a Check Pilot, and awarded compensation of Rs. 25,000, emphasizing the importance of upholding natural justice principles and providing appropriate relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>