<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 400 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185527</link>
    <description>Vanaspati manufacture and sale of vegetable oil and refined oil were treated as an &quot;oil mill&quot; for item 5 of Part I of the Schedule to the Minimum Wages Act, because vanaspati was held to retain the essential character of oil despite processes such as neutralisation, bleaching, deodorisation, hardening and hydrogenation. The Court also relied on the unchallenged finding that oil and refined oil were sold in the ordinary course of business, showing that a substantial part of the undertaking was connected with oil-mill activity. Once the employment fell within the Schedule, objections based on the wage-fixation committee and the alleged non-application of sections 5 and 9 failed, and the Act applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 15:33:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 400 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185527</link>
      <description>Vanaspati manufacture and sale of vegetable oil and refined oil were treated as an &quot;oil mill&quot; for item 5 of Part I of the Schedule to the Minimum Wages Act, because vanaspati was held to retain the essential character of oil despite processes such as neutralisation, bleaching, deodorisation, hardening and hydrogenation. The Court also relied on the unchallenged finding that oil and refined oil were sold in the ordinary course of business, showing that a substantial part of the undertaking was connected with oil-mill activity. Once the employment fell within the Schedule, objections based on the wage-fixation committee and the alleged non-application of sections 5 and 9 failed, and the Act applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>