<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cenvat Credit Denial Overturned: No Evidence of Suppression or Intent to Evade Duty in Audited Records Dispute.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30821</link>
    <description>Denial of cenvat credit - the credit entries were in the regular records, which were audited and the dispute arose thereafter only. Therefore, invoking extended period with an allegation of suppression of facts and willful mis-statement with an intend to evade payment of duty is not sustainable. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:48:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cenvat Credit Denial Overturned: No Evidence of Suppression or Intent to Evade Duty in Audited Records Dispute.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30821</link>
      <description>Denial of cenvat credit - the credit entries were in the regular records, which were audited and the dispute arose thereafter only. Therefore, invoking extended period with an allegation of suppression of facts and willful mis-statement with an intend to evade payment of duty is not sustainable. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:48:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>