<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 252 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4504</link>
    <description>The appeal was rejected in favor of the respondent as the Tribunal found that the admissibility of Cenvat credit on duty paid inputs used for job work goods was covered by the decision in the Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. case. Despite the Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal determined that the interpretation of Rule 57C in relation to Modvat credit reversal also aligned with the respondent&#039;s position. The appeal was dismissed based on the Tribunal&#039;s analysis of the law and the specific facts of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 252 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4504</link>
      <description>The appeal was rejected in favor of the respondent as the Tribunal found that the admissibility of Cenvat credit on duty paid inputs used for job work goods was covered by the decision in the Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. case. Despite the Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal determined that the interpretation of Rule 57C in relation to Modvat credit reversal also aligned with the respondent&#039;s position. The appeal was dismissed based on the Tribunal&#039;s analysis of the law and the specific facts of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>