<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 596 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the order passed by the Ld. CIT under section 263 of the Act. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned. The failure to deduct TDS on freight charges was deemed in compliance with section 194C. The disallowance of loading charges and treatment of unmatched financial charges were both ruled in favor of the assessee, with the Tribunal finding no errors warranting revision or prejudice to the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:08:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 596 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the order passed by the Ld. CIT under section 263 of the Act. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned. The failure to deduct TDS on freight charges was deemed in compliance with section 194C. The disallowance of loading charges and treatment of unmatched financial charges were both ruled in favor of the assessee, with the Tribunal finding no errors warranting revision or prejudice to the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>